In the first sentence, we're using present tense while in the second sentence it's past tense with 'has' as an auxiliary verb followed by 'led'. He has led us through tough times before.âTo leadâ means to guide or direct, while âto ledâ is the past tense of âto lead.â This can cause difficulty in determining which word to use in certain contexts, especially since their past-tense forms differ by just one letter. The reason for this ambiguity is that both words are spelled differently yet pronounced similarly. The verbs âto leadâ and âto ledâ perfectly illustrate this concept. These two words are homophones - they sound alike but have different meanings. Introduction To The Confusion Between Led And Lead The Difference Between Led and LeadĪs a writer, I've encountered the confusion between led and lead countless times. Using lead instead of led as the past tense of lead is a common mistake.Lead as a noun is pronounced differently than lead as a verb.Lead is also a noun that refers to a heavy metal.Lead is a verb that means to guide or direct.In this article, we'll explore when to use each version of this tricky verb. When it comes to irregular verbs, lead can lead to some confusion.īoth spellings are correct but choosing the right one depends on its usage in a sentence. Gawker’s Denton said in a statement that Ziff Davis’ e-commerce, licensing and video assets would be a good fit with Gawker’s websites, which include tech site Gizmodo, sports site Deadpsin, video-game site Kotaku, celebrity and women-focused site Jezebel, news and gossip site Gawker, car-site Jalopnik and self-help site Lifehacker.By Asim Akhtar (CEO) Led or LeadâWhat Is the Past Tense of Lead? One of his lawyers, David Houston, said in a statement that the wrestler and his legal team intend to pursue the judgment award and hold Gawker “accountable.” In the filing, Hogan, whose real name is Terry Bollea, was listed as Gawker’s biggest creditor. “While many of us disagreed with Gawker’s news judgment in this case, and many are ambivalent about Gawker itself, the issue here was a billionaire’s use and potential abuse of the legal process to drain a journalism outlet’s resources.” “You don’t want billionaires to be any final arbiter of press fairness - that’s just not democracy,” he said. Media analyst Dean Starkman, a fellow at the Center for Media, Data and Society at the Central European University in Budapest, said the bankruptcy was an “ominous development” for journalism. A Gawker-owned site, Valleywag, ran a number of stories skewering Facebook, which provided a big chunk of Thiel’s estimated $2.7 billion fortune.Ī spokesman for Thiel said he had no comment on Friday. Thiel, who co-founded PayPal and was an early investor in Facebook, has been a frequent target of Gawker writers, who have written unflattering pieces about his political beliefs and utopian goals. Only afterward did Thiel’s part in funding Hogan’s lawsuit become clear.
GAWKER BANKRUPCY PLUS
Hogan still won a judgment for $115 million in compensatory damages plus an added $25.1 million in punitive damages. Gawker said the footage was newsworthy information about a public figure, and protected by the First Amendment. Hogan sued Gawker after it posted a video of him having sex with a friend’s wife. The New York publisher said in the filing that it has as much as $500 million in debt and up to $100 million in assets. Gawker filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection about three months after Hogan won a lawsuit against the online gossip and news publisher. The move also allows Gawker’s web sites to keep operating normally, the company says.
0 kommentar(er)
